Seo Hyeon Jang vs Jesy Chea Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Aug at 10:51 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Hyeon Jang vs J. Chea

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SGP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jang 1 - 0 Chea
They have played 2 sets in total, with Seo Hyeon Jang winning 2 and Jesy Chea winning 0. The last match between Seo Hyeon Jang and Jesy Chea was at the W15 Singapore, 03-08-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Seo Hyeon Jang getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jang | 1 |
| Chea | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W15 Singapore(08-03-25)
S. H. Jang vs J. Chea H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.57% (17-18) | Career Total W/L | 23.08% (3-10) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. H. Jang vs J. Chea Match Preview:
- Chea struggles significantly with their second serve, winning 0% of these points in the last 6 months; in comparison, Jang has achieved a 30.77% success rate, reflecting a potential advantage in serves.
- Jang showcases superior return game statistics, capturing 37.04% of points on opponents' second serves, while Chea has been unable to win any.
- In terms of first serve returns, Jang again surpasses Chea, with a 32.65% success rate against Chea's 0%.
- Chea is ineffective at saving breakpoints, having saved 0%, whereas Jang has successfully saved 45%, providing a crucial edge under pressure. Which player handles pressure better? Jang seems to have the upper hand.
- Jang has a higher overall match win rate in the past year at 42.86% compared to Chea’s 30%.
- Both players show their best career performances on Hard surfaces. Jang leads with a 46% win rate, compared to Chea’s 38%.
- Chea has a better success rate in deciding sets, with a 100% win rate, while Jang shows 67% success.
- In terms of break point conversions over recent months, Jang has capitalized on 20% of their opportunities, whereas Chea has been unsuccessful.
- Comparatively, Jang has faced stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 166.93 against Chea’s 259.7.
Editorial Prediction (August 3, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent form and historical performance data, Jang appears to hold several advantages over Chea in this tennis matchup.
Jang's superior second serve success, adeptness at breaking points, and capability to save crucial breakpoints position them as the likely favorite.
Given the clear statistical evidence and Jang’s ability to perform under pressure and against higher-ranked opponents, they are projected to win this upcoming match.
Seo Hyeon Jang vs Jesy Chea Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. H. Jang vs J. Chea H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 0:54:11 | Average Match Time | 0:54:11 |
| 74% (29/39) | 1st Serve % | 71% (20/28) |
| 66% (19/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 20% (4/20) |
| 70% (7/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/8) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 86% (24/28) | Return Points Win % | 33% (13/39) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. H. Jang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 3-6 10-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(0) 6-0 | ||
J. Chea Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||

S. H. Jang vs J. Chea Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.57% (17/18) | YTD Win/Loss | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 48.10% (38/41) | Sets Win/Loss | 22.22% (6/21) |
| 48.47% (348/370) | Games Win/Loss | 31.34% (63/138) |
| 48.28% (14/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 6 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 39 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 188.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 192.54 |
| 68% (594/880) | 1st Serve % | 61% (69/114) |
| 55% (325/594) | 1st Serve Win % | 33% (23/69) |
| 42% (121/286) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (11/45) |
| 51% (59/115) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 49% (399/809) | Return Points Win % | 31% (36/116) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (14/14) | Futures W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 49% (17/35) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 23% (3/13) |
| 100% (4/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (5/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 83% (18/15) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 17% (18/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 12% (17/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (11/1) |